The “Food v/s Fuel” debate may no longer be useful

As the crisis in Ukraine worsens and nations produce more biofuels to bring down gas prices, we are hearing more talk about the “food versus fuel” debate.

A recent study shows that arguments may no longer be useful.

Purdue University researchers looked over the numbers, going all the way back to 2004 when the Renewable Fuels Standard went into effect. Researchers say that they used a model that takes into account trade-offs between food versus fuel. They found that the biofuel blending mandate has helped farmers be more efficient, and reduced uncertainty in the markets.

Farmers have also been able to bring fallow land back into production.

Related:

Biofuels Can Help Bring Down Soaring Gas Prices

“Reinforce our energy independence": Growth Energy on how biofuels can help us at the pump as prices head toward record levels

Renewable Fuels Association reacts to the EPA’s newest rules

Renewable Fuels Association weighs in on corn ethanol controversy